Some of the best leaders in any organization are reserved, thoughtful, and quiet people. They defy the stereotype that leaders must be dynamic or charismatic to create followership. In a room full of leaders, quiet leaders typically outnumber the outspoken types.
With the hope that in some cases, it is not vapid and empty. Better to have the "default" that that may be the case (said charismatic leader may be a decent human), otherwise no one can be trusted, and then human condition is in constant dread?
Why is charisma often so associated with leadership?
What is it about the human condition that draws us toward charisma, even when it is vapid and empty?
With the hope that in some cases, it is not vapid and empty. Better to have the "default" that that may be the case (said charismatic leader may be a decent human), otherwise no one can be trusted, and then human condition is in constant dread?