6 Comments
User's avatar
Steve's avatar

"Exploring the idea first with supporters and mentors is about validation, not acceptance."

That's the hard part for me. I typically am always distracted by approval and acceptance.

Separating out the idea as the thing that needs validation and not me is a challenge.

Expand full comment
Admired Leadership's avatar

If an idea isn't sturdy, and you know it, sometimes we replace personal validation just to distract from what we already know it true about the idea.

Expand full comment
Sunil Bhandari's avatar

The last line. It’s gold. ❤️

Expand full comment
Mikey Ames's avatar

This is the similar model that professional campaign fundraisers follow as well.

First doing an inside feasibility study.

Then moving to strategic planning which almost always includes a wider feasibility study.

That includes asking people who much they might pledge if the study turns into an actual campaign.

By the time the wide feasibility is wrapping up, a campaign will already know how large of a campaign they should mount because all the major donors have already indicated what their pledge will be. Most public campaigns announce their goals with 80% of their pledges already assessed during the feasibility stage. The last 20% is typically raised between mid sized donors. By the time it gets to a public solicitation in most people's inboxes, they're only 10% away from the public goal.

It is worth thinking thru that model in application here when thinking thru the subroutines.

Expand full comment
Admired Leadership's avatar

There is something about breaking down the subroutines of accepted best practices - there always seems to be great lessons everywhere.

Thanks for this breakdown.

Expand full comment
Steve's avatar

of course!

Expand full comment