Trial lawyers face a dilemma any time they object to evidence or testimony in a trial. On the one hand, advocates don’t want misinformation or hearsay to unduly influence a jury. On the other hand, objecting to the evidence draws attention to it. In the eyes of jurors, any information that is important enough to squabble over is worth a closer look.
This post is a great lesson in strategy and consequences and something we often think through when faced with similar situations. Sometimes your choice is the least worst of two…
This post is a great lesson in strategy and consequences and something we often think through when faced with similar situations. Sometimes your choice is the least worst of two…
True, Susan.
Another insight is how others more harshly judge any follow-up action.
People are generally forgiving of a mistake, but the negative reaction to the mistake doesn't get the same forgiveness.