Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David C Morris's avatar

Rarely do you get there (show/share weaknesses) in one interview. I recommend 'going on a few dates' before you decide to 'hop into bed' with them. But how many of us are subject to the 'one night stand' only to wake up the next morning (after a few weeks on the job) with the ugly truth? Slow the process down, stretch it out over a couple of weeks. Don't have the time? Think about how much time you will waste in hiring the wrong person. Talk to your Recruiters too - is the candidate available, responsive, and friendly? Or do they not answer/reply to calls/emails and are they entitled or rude? Talk to your Executive Admins when interviewing Executive candidates. Re: How do they "treat the unimportantly importantly"? Executive Admins know the ugly truth, but are rarely asked their opinion until after the person is hired. Lastly, HR Guy disclaimer - make sure your interview questions are job related and tied to important work outcomes.

Expand full comment
Dr. Jim Salvucci's avatar

I like this approach. I would add one more suggestion. I always ended interviews with the same question: “If you were in my seat and interviewing candidates for this open position, what would be your hesitation in hiring you?”

The question is disarming, so answers can be most revealing. Here you get direct knowledge whether a candidate is capable of cognitive empathy.

Even though I was asking about hesitations, the shift in perspective was usually broader. Candidates who girded themselves in armor for the interview suddenly sat there in street clothes, revealing their weaknesses. Candidates who lacked confidence suddenly found themselves articulating their strengths.

There is no perfect way to assess candidates, but I always found this question, posed last, cut through a lot of nonsense.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts